Showing posts with label Benefits and Total Rewards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Benefits and Total Rewards. Show all posts

Monday, November 25, 2013

Shorter Commute Time

Shorter Commute TimeHow long is your commute to work?  If you are anything like me, you drive to work.  However, some of you may walk, bike, or take the train.  However you choose to get there, the amount of time that it takes an employee to get to work can greatly effect job satisfaction.  A short commute can be a huge perk for  whichever employer they may work for.  Please feel free to leave a comment or suggestion down below about your own experiences with commuting.

Employment Perk:  Shorter Commute Time

Some 600,000 people are now defined by the Census as Mega-Commuters, travelling over 50 miles or 90 minutes each way, each day.  According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the average commute time for most Americans is about 25 minutes.  I suspect that for the majority of Americans, that is 25 minutes too long.  If you want to see what the average local commute time is in your own county, you ought to check out this map by WNYC:  http://project.wnyc.org/commute-times-us/embed.html#5.00/42.000/-89.500.

Most employees hate the time they spend sitting in traffic; it is aggravating for them knowing how many other things they could be doing if they were already home.  Also, it is a known health hazard due to the increase it causes in sedentary lifestyles.  A short commute is something that HR professionals and managers can sell as a perk to candidates on a potential position.  Remind them of how close they are to major roadways or train stations.  If a candidate volunteers their frustration with a long commute in an interview, be sure to mention any available features such as carpooling, public transit, or travel reimbursement.  A shorter time spent in a vehicle is something that is sure to attract some candidates.

My current drive time to work is below the average, clocking in at about 15 minutes.  How do you get to work?  How long does it take?

And remember all of you Human Resources professionals:  Be Human... Be a Resource...  Be a Resource for Humans.


Interesting Links:
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/28/commutings-hidden-cost/?_r=0
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/story/2012-05-23/long-commute-poor-health/55162620/1
http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/pdf/poster_megacommuting_in_the_u.s.pdf
http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/american_community_survey_acs/cb13-41.html



Note: Please view the Disclaimer page for all liabilities and limitations.

View Trevor Stasik's profile on LinkedIn

Friday, March 1, 2013

Casual Friday: Coffee At Work


Java.  Joe.  Black Gold.  Battery Acid.  Wake-up Juice.  Whatever you call coffee, odds are pretty good that you have some in your workplace.  Welcome to my next installment of "Casual Friday," my lighter look at something in Human Resources, Management, or Business.  Today I want to talk about coffee at work.  Please take a moment at the end of my post to comment on any of your experiences with coffee in your own workplaces.

Good Morning Sunshine

Have you ever felt like you had to drag your sorry self to work and you were just in need of something to get you moving?  Well, if you work somewhere in the United States, you probably have coffee in your workplace for just that purpose.  Offices all over this great land offer this free as a great perk for working at a particular company.  Some people are not as lucky, and have to get their coffee by chipping into a pool or using coin-operated vending.  Some people have cheap cafeteria coffee.  Some people have a joyous Starbucks built into their office complex.  There are many ways to get your coffee and many benefits to having coffee at work.

Historically Speaking

Let’s talk a little bit about the history of coffee.  According to Ethiopian legend, a 9th century goat herder named Kaldi had discovered that when his goats ate some berries off of a plant.  Suddenly, his herd became spirited and would not fall asleep.  After informing the local monastery of this, the monks there made a unique drink from the berries.  Kaldi drank of this mixture, and became alert and productive.  Coffee was born.

Coffee was brought to old New Amsterdam in the mid-1600s where it languished beneath the prestige of tea until King George established his tax on tea in 1773.  Following the Boston Tea Party revolt, young Americans refused to drink British tea and chose the other caffeinated brew instead.  The popularity of coffee grew over the next centuries as people around the world found it to be a tasty way to get productive!

Happiness is a Warm Cup of Coffee

There are a number of caffeinated thoughts that companies have when designing their coffee-based benefits.  First, they consider the productive boost given to their workforce when they drink coffee.  41% of workers report being more productive when they have a cup of coffee during the day.  Next, employers will usually consider the morale boost that offering coffee gives.  In a survey 37% of employees preferred free, daily, fresh ground coffee or tea to having a company holiday party.

I have been fortunate and have had free coffee available at most of the companies that I have worked for.  One of the places even had one of those Keurig cup machines.  I loved the “Dark Magic” blend.  I am sure my productivity was given a boost.  What have been your experiences?

And remember all of you Human Resources professionals:  Be Human... Be a Resource...  Be a Resource for Humans.

Useful Links:



Disclaimer: The views expressed in this post are by the author Trevor Stasik, and do not necessarily reflect the views of any employer or any other organization. Please note, this information is based on my understanding and is only to be used for informational and educational purposes. Do not take what I am writing as advice. Seek your own legal counsel and/or see a tax accountant before making business or personal decisions. The author of this post makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.

View Trevor Stasik's profile on LinkedIn

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

EEO Laws GINA - Follow-up


An old friend of mine pointed out that the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) did not extend out to supplemental insurance.  I thought that it was an interesting thought, so I am following up on it today.  As always, please feel free to leave a comment or an opinion below.

EEO Laws GINA - Follow-up

We had previously discuss how GINA was established to allow an individual work some protections of their individual genetic code.  Employers cannot discriminate against you when it comes to your genetic predispositions and insurance companies cannot treat you differently based on your genetic code.  Some of you may have supplemental insurance through your employer, such as life insurance, long-term care insurance, or disability insurance.  These insurances are not considered medical insurance, and will not necessarily be covered under GINA. 

You most likely have already added a section to your employee handbook describing GINA for your employees.  As employees may become sensitive to this loophole in GINA, it may be helpful to add a one line notice to your employee handbook about what insurance is covered and is not covered by this law.  You may want to check with your company’s legal counsel regarding any questions here.

And remember all of you Human Resources professionals:  Be Human... Be a Resource...  Be a Resource for Humans.



Useful Links:



Disclaimer: The views expressed in this post are by the author Trevor Stasik, and do not necessarily reflect the views of any employer or any other organization. Please note, this information is based on my understanding and is only to be used for informational and educational purposes. Do not take what I am writing as advice. Seek your own legal counsel and/or see a tax accountant before making business or personal decisions. The author of this post makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.

View Trevor Stasik's profile on LinkedIn

Sunday, February 24, 2013

EEO Laws - GINA


Have you ever heard of an employer refusing to hire a new applicant on the basis of their family medical history?  Have you ever heard of an insurer charging someone higher rates based on their predisposition to developing a disease in the future?  Both of these situations may be considered discriminatory and illegal.  Today, we will look at this further.  As always, please feel free to comment below with your own experiences and opinions.

EEO Laws - GINA

Continuing on with our discussion of Equal Employment Opportunity laws, this morning I would like to take a few moments to discuss the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA).  According to Congress, the term “Genetic Information” includes results from an individual’s genetic tests, results from genetic tests of an individual’s family members, and the manifestation of any disease in any family member.  This act is exactly how it sounds; it protects employees and applicants from discrimination based on their own Genetic Information.  Organizations with over 15 employees will be subject to this law.

Employers and GINA

You are not allowed to collect the genetic information of your employees.  It is illegal to seek out that information or to ask about it, with some exceptions.  Exceptions can include limited access for medical and healthcare providers offering services, for those monitoring the workplace for toxic substances, and law enforcement.  Employers are also allowed to offer voluntary health risk assessments to their employees.  Individuals being served or monitored may be required to complete forms providing the company with written authorization.  Employers may inadvertently receive genetic information when requesting medical information for on an employee.    Employers are permitted to seek out limited information as part of FMLA certification.

To protect yourself, be sure to include a notice when requesting information that the medical providers not include any genetic information with the records that are being sent.

If you, the employer, inadvertently come across that genetic information, you must remember to treat that information as completely private.  Be sure to protect that information on a strictly need to know basis.  You cannot use that information in any discriminatory way.  You cannot base any of your employment or insurance decisions on that information.  You cannot prevent or block promotions or pay increases based genetic data; nor can you harass an individual in any way based on genetic information.

Human Resources personnel should be sure to put up the EEO posters in a pubic and visible place; and which include the GINA law.  Remember to notify workers of their genetic information rights in their Employee handbooks.

Complaints

Employees and applicants have the same full range of remedies available to them as with other statuses under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.  They have the right of placing a lawsuit against the organization, seeking damages, reinstatement, back pay, etc.  The employee can file with the EEOC, who may give them a notice of a Right to Sue.  The EEOC may also file the civil suit on behalf of the employees.

There are some people that are concerned that genetic data collected by insurance companies during medical testing could be used to discriminate against them.  This Act seeks to prevent that.

And remember all of you Human Resources professionals:  Be Human... Be a Resource...  Be a Resource for Humans.

Useful Links



Disclaimer: The views expressed in this post are by the author Trevor Stasik, and do not necessarily reflect the views of any employer or any other organization. Please note, this information is based on my understanding and is only to be used for informational and educational purposes. Do not take what I am writing as advice. Seek your own legal counsel and/or see a tax accountant before making business or personal decisions. The author of this post makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.

View Trevor Stasik's profile on LinkedIn

Thursday, January 24, 2013

EEO Laws - Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA)


I hope that you are having a great morning.  Some time ago, it was not unheard of for a woman to be paid less for doing the same job as a man.  This may even continue in some places today.  This is illegal and brings us to the subject of my next post.  As always, I would love to hear your own experiences or opinions on the matter.  Please add to the discussion in the comments section below.

EEO Laws - Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA)

Today I would like to continue with our dialogue on EEO Laws.  We will now touch on the topic of the Equal Pay Act of 1963.  Signed into law by President John F. Kennedy, the law prohibits compensation discrimination on the basis of sex.  It effectively provides that a woman should be paid equally and fairly for producing the same work as if a man were in the same position. 

The act provides that the following are the reasons why the pay disparity was abolished:
-- Lowers wages and living standards
-- Prevents maximum productivity of workforce
-- Causes disputes in the workplace over pay gaps
-- Burdens commerce 
-- Unfair competition

Same Job?

There are a series of qualifications which may be tested to see if a job one employee is similar enough that they ought to be getting paid the same as another.  In the case of the EPA, specifically between a job a female is doing versus a male counterpart.  The qualifications looked at include Skill, Responsibility, Effort, Working Conditions, Establishment.  For Skill, consider what knowledge and aptitude is needed for a job; is it the same for both?  For Responsibility, you will want to look at the accountability one has in a job, as well as their ability to delegate work.  Effort looks at the physical and mental exertion needed to complete a job.  For Working Conditions, consider the risks and environmental situations that both employees are working in.  Lastly, consider where the work takes place, also known as the Establishment.  Are they both working in the same location?  If you can answer yes to these questions, you ought to consider the jobs equal and they should be receiving the same pay.

When correcting unequal pay, you must be careful to never lower the wages of the person currently receiving more money.  You are only allowed to raise up the person that was making less.

Lawsuits and Filing

Human Resources representatives and managers will want to take seriously any claims a worker makes on the basis of compensation and gender disparity.  Employees that feel that they are receiving less money for producing the same work as a member of the opposite sex may choose to file a lawsuit.  Under the EPA, employees can take their employer directly to court without first filing a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.  All forms of compensation are covered under the EPA including stock options, bonus plans, reimbursement of travel expenses, and benefits.  The EPA does not have any time limit for filing a suit, but if an employee is also filing a claim under Title VII, they will likely follow that 180 day deadline per the EEOC.

And remember all of you Human Resources professionals:  Be Human... Be a Resource...  Be a Resource for Humans.



Useful Links:



Disclaimer: The views expressed in this post are by the author Trevor Stasik, and do not necessarily reflect the views of any employer or any other organization. Please note, this information is based on my understanding and is only to be used for informational and educational purposes. Do not take what I am writing as advice. Seek your own legal counsel and/or see a tax accountant before making business or personal decisions. The author of this post makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.

View Trevor Stasik's profile on LinkedIn

Sunday, January 13, 2013

PPACA, the Supreme Court, Contraceptive Pills, and Employers

Some issues surrounding the Patient Protection Affordability and Care Act (PPACA) are still being hammered out in courts and workplaces.  One employer, Hobby Lobby, disagrees with a contraception requirement and is facing potential excise taxes as a result.  As this may be a controversial topic, please feel free to leave a comment about your own experiences and your own opinions.

PPACA, the Supreme Court, Contraceptive Pills, and Employers

As of January 1st, resulting from passage of the PPACA, arts and crafts retailer Hobby Lobby faced a $100 per participant per day per plan excise tax for failure to offer their employees the “morning after pill” as part of their health benefits package.  Hobby Lobby maintains that they should be protected from offering this due to the religious objections of the company’s owners.  Overall, this will result in approximately $1.3 million per day fines for the company.

On 12/26/2012, Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor rejected an appeal on the case, as it still had not been heard in a Court of Appeals.  Following her decline to grant an injunction on the mandate for contraception protection, the company faced the steep fines.  However, the company claims that they have discovered a loophole in the IRS regulations behind the fines.   Lawyers for the Hobby Lobby are going to take advantage of a “grandfather clause” which will postpone the date in which they will be required to comply with the contraception mandate.  According to general counsel Peter Dobelbower, "Hobby Lobby does not provide coverage for abortion-inducing drugs in its health care plan.  Hobby Lobby will continue to vigorously defend its religious liberty and oppose the mandate and any penalties."

The Hobby Lobby case is due to be heard in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in the near future; a date has not yet been set.

And remember all of you Human Resources professionals:  Be Human... Be a Resource...  Be a Resource for Humans. 

Relevant Links:



Disclaimer: The views expressed in this post are by the author Trevor Stasik, and do not necessarily reflect the views of any employer or any other organization. Please note, this information is based on my understanding and is only to be used for informational and educational purposes. Do not take what I am writing as advice. Seek your own legal counsel and/or see a tax accountant before making business or personal decisions. The author of this post makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.

View Trevor Stasik's profile on LinkedIn

Friday, January 11, 2013

Pets in the Office

Will your office allow pets to roam?
Welcome to another next installment of "Casual Friday," my lighter look at something in Human Resources, Management, or Business. Do you love the idea of fur on your keyboard?  Have you heard barks coming from your neighbor’s cubicle?  If so, you may have pets at your workplace.  Let the fur fly?  Please take a moment at the end of my post to comment on any of your own experiences with animals in the office.  

Pets in the Office

Allowing pets in the office can be a great non-monetary benefit that you could offer your employees as part of a Total Rewards package.  It can also help foster creativity and encourage worker socialization.  So, what is your company’s policy about having animals at work?  How will you handle an employee that brings their cute Tabby into work?  Will your policy be any different for the employee that brings in a Doberman, a Bunny, or even a Boa Constrictor?  These are a few things to consider.  Should your company ban pets outright?  There are a number of things that should be weighed when developing a pet policy for an office workplace.

Service Animals

For any number of reasons, some individuals require the assistance of an animal to overcome a handicap or medical situation.  These working animals are considered “Service Animals” and not pets.  Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), “Service animals are defined as dogs that are individually trained to do work or perform tasks for people with disabilities.”  Interestingly enough, the ADA also says “In addition to the provisions about service dogs, the Department’s revised ADA regulations have a new, separate provision about miniature horses that have been individually trained to do work or perform tasks for people with disabilities.”  Under the ADA, unless the service animal creates undue hardship in the workplace, reasonable accommodation should be made to allow for the worker using a service animal.

Pet Policy

Having lovable creatures at work can lower stress and possibly lead to higher productivity.  However, some workers might not appreciate pets in the office or they may be allergic.  If your company decides to allow, or even encourage, people bringing their pets to work, what should your policy look like?  Here are a few ideas to include:

Pet size - Consider limiting the pet based on weight or height.  This will help ensure that none of your workers bring in a giant bear.

Pet type - Consider limiting the pets to a specific type such as cats or dogs.  This will help to avoid rodent situations should a worker want to bring in an army of pet gerbils.  The last thing that an employer wants to deal with is rodents loose in the office.

Pet Zones - Consider creating pet-free zones so those that do not appreciate the animals have a place to retreat to.  This should include areas where there might be food, such as the cafeteria.

Cleanliness - Consider a requirement that pets be housebroken and any messes they make must be cleaned up immediately by the owner.

Space - Consider a requirement that pets remain in a crate or within the confines of the owner’s cubicle.  A leash requirement could also assist with keeping pets from entering pets from entering neighboring cubicles.

Safety and Noise - Consider a notice that employees with unruly pets may be sent home without pay.

Pets in the office can be a great non-monetary incentive to bring talent into the workplace.  It can increase happiness and cheer among the workers.  If the work environment is appropriate, employers may want to consider adopting a pet friendly policy.

And remember all of you Human Resources professionals:  Be Human... Be a Resource...  Be a Resource for Humans.


Useful Links:
http://healthland.time.com/2012/03/30/how-bring-your-dog-to-work-days-could-lower-stress/
http://www.hrhero.com/hl/articles/2008/03/21/pets-in-the-office/
http://www.ada.gov/qasrvc.htm
http://www.ada.gov/service_animals_2010.htm
http://askjan.org/media/servanim.html



Disclaimer: The views expressed in this post are by the author Trevor Stasik, and do not necessarily reflect the views of any employer or any other organization. Please note, this information is based on my understanding and is only to be used for informational and educational purposes. Do not take what I am writing as advice. Seek your own legal counsel and/or see a tax accountant before making business or personal decisions. The author of this post makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.

View Trevor Stasik's profile on LinkedIn

Friday, January 4, 2013

Fruit in the Office


Welcome to my next installment of "Casual Friday," my lighter look at something in Human Resources, Management, or Business.  Today I want to talk about an experience I had some time back with fruit in the office.  Please take a moment at the end of my post to comment on any of your experiences with fruit in your own workplaces.

Fruit in the Office

Several years back, when I was working in Center City Philadelphia, the company had just been merged with a new parent out of Australia.  That company took great pride in the health of its employees, and it offered free fruit as a way to encourage healthy eating habits.  This at first seemed a little strange.  Every morning, a local vendor brought in several pounds of apples, pears, oranges, and bananas and deposited it to each floor in the building.  I was very cautious at first, but eventually I enjoyed a few of the apples.  It was a perk; a non-monetary incentive. 

Ultimately, the fruit was a great success.  It was great!  It encouraged all of the workers to eat healthier, including me.  I think that I lost several pounds after that happened.  For the company, long term, I imagine that it reduced their workers use of insurance as people unintentionally fell into healthier eating habits.  It was really quite something to behold.  I also think that the free fruit helped the workers accept the merger, as there was a clear benefit to the employees that was immediately realized.  Looking back, the fruit was a wonderful incentive and I wish I saw other employers encouraging healthy eating like this.

What are your experiences with Fruit in the office?  What kind of eating is your workplace promoting?

And remember all of you Human Resources professionals:  Be Human... Be a Resource...  Be a Resource for Humans.



Disclaimer:  The views expressed in this post are by the author Trevor Stasik, and do not necessarily reflect the views of any employer or any other organization. Please note, this information is based on my understanding and is only to be used for informational and educational purposes.  Do not take what I am writing as advice.  Seek your own legal counsel and/or see a tax accountant before making business or personal decisions.  The author of this post makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.


View Trevor Stasik's profile on LinkedIn

Sunday, December 23, 2012

Use It or Lose It


Does you workplace culture encourage employees to “work too much”?  With only a few business days left, the end of the year is rapidly approaching.  Have your employees used all of their allowed time off?  In most cases, their PTO will rollover to the next year.  However, at some companies, an employee has time that is also known as “Use It or Lose It” time. 

Use It or Lose It

If the employee fails to make use of this time by December 31st, they do not get to take it with them into the next year.  If they do not use this time, it disappears off of the books.  Depending on state law, they may not get anything for not using it. 

If the business can accommodate it, managers may want to encourage their workers to make use of these days now.  While it is understandable that there may be deadlines approaching, consider that supporting an employee’s use of their PTO can improve productivity, reduce workplace tension, improve the mental health of your employees, and aid retention. 

It is the holidays; consider allowing your employees to unwind a little now and they will come back refreshed and ready to work.

And remember all of you Human Resources professionals:  Be Human... Be a Resource...  Be a Resource for Humans.



Disclaimer:  The views expressed in this post are by the author Trevor Stasik, and do not necessarily reflect the views of any employer or any other organization. Please note, this information is based on my understanding and is only to be used for informational and educational purposes.  Do not take what I am writing as advice.  Seek your own legal counsel and/or see a tax accountant before making business or personal decisions.  The author of this post makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.


View Trevor Stasik's profile on LinkedIn

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Finding an Insurer’s Medical Loss Ratio (MLR)

Finding an Insurer’s Medical Loss Ratio (MLR)

As stated in a previous post, the Patient Protection Affordability and Care Act (PPACA) requires that an insurance company meet a Medical Loss Ratio.  The Medical Loss Ratio requires that 80% to 85% of patients’ premium dollars go towards medical treatments and healthcare improvements.  At the time of my previous post, I was unable to point you in the direction of where the government publicly made that information available.  I have that information now.

How to find it?

1)  Go to HealthCare.gov.  Click on “Get Help Using Insurance”.

2)  On the next page, click on “Your Insurance Company & Costs of Coverage”


3)  Look for the part of the screen where it allows you to “Find Basic Information About Your Insurance Company”


4)  Enter the state and insurer’s name that you want to find out about.  Click MLR.  Then click search.

For the purpose of an example, I chose my state Pennsylvania, and a major insurer in the state, Independence Blue Cross.

5)  You will find your Medical Loss Ratio and a calculated Average Rebate on the bottom of this next page.

In this example using Independence Blue Cross, the insurers MLR of 96.3% was greater than both the 80% threshold for the Individual Market and 85% for the Large Group Market.  Therefore, they have met the MLR Standard and no rebate is required.

I hope this information has been helpful.  I would like to thank Blake Hutson from LinkedIn for helping me locate this information.  He provided me with the direct link:  http://companyprofiles.healthcare.gov/

And remember all of you Human Resources professionals:  Be Human... Be a Resource...  Be a Resource for Humans.




Disclaimer:  The views expressed in this post are by the author Trevor Stasik, and do not necessarily reflect the views of any employer or any other organization. Please note, this information is based on my understanding and is only to be used for informational and educational purposes.  Do not take what I am writing as advice.  Seek your own legal counsel and/or see a tax accountant before making business or personal decisions.  The author of this post makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.

View Trevor Stasik's profile on LinkedIn

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

HHS Rolled Out New Guidelines For PPACA


I would like to discuss another portion of the Patient Protection Affordability and Care Act (PPACA) in this post.  I will return to my posts about interviews tomorrow.  There is some additional guidance that was just released by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) with the rules that will govern these areas:  Denying Coverage, Essential Health Benefits, Benchmark Plans, Wellness Programs and Unfair Underwriting. 

Denying Coverage

There was some additional clarification about how this would work.  As of Jan. 1, 2014, insurers will not be allowed to prevent care based on pre-existing conditions.  The insurers will also not be allowed to charge a higher premium based on gender, occupation, or employer.  The insurers will be allowed to charge a higher premium based on age, tobacco use, family size, and geography.  In the event an individual is denied coverage for some reason, they will be allowed access to the healthcare exchange.  Individuals will be required to purchase their coverage during open enrollment periods.

Essential Health Benefits (EHB)

All insurance plans, including those on the Healthcare Exchanges, will be required to provide these 10 items at a minimum:
·         Ambulatory patient services
·         Emergency services
·         Hospitalization
·         Maternity and newborn care
·         Mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment
·         Prescription drugs
·         Rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices
·         Laboratory services
·         Preventive and wellness services and chronic disease management
·         Pediatric services, including oral and vision care

Benchmark Plans

The new rules require that each state selects a “benchmark” plan that offers these EHB services in quality and affordability.  All other insurance plans will then be rated and judged in comparison to that plan.  The rules governing the benchmark plans are still up for public comment.  Some additional items that may be added or changed including a Drug listing benchmark, preventive care benchmark, and a mental health standards benchmark.  If a state fails to; or refuses to select a benchmark plan, the HHS will select one for them.

Wellness Programs and Unfair Underwriting
New guidelines were release regarding employer based wellness programs.  Insurance plans will be required to offer coverage of programs designed to reduce disease and promote health.  These plans must be reasonably expected to be effective, cannot be overly burdensome for an employee to use, must be fairly and equally offered, with accommodation offered for those who cannot medically participate in the primarily offered wellness program.  Any health problems revealed in the course of a wellness program cannot be unfairly used to increase premiums.

Additional rules that were rolled out for the PPACA also include actuarial value rulings with regards to “Medal” levels and rules on Accreditation standards

There really is much more to the PPACA and these rules than I have the time to put down here.  There is so much; I certainly do not understand it all.  I suggest you do your own research to learn more. 

Relevant Links:
http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2012pres/11/20121120a.html
http://www.healthcare.gov/news/factsheets/2012/11/market-reforms11202012a.html
http://www.healthcare.gov/news/factsheets/2012/11/ehb11202012a.html
http://cciio.cms.gov/resources/data/ehb.html#review benchmarks
http://www.healthcare.gov/news/factsheets/2012/11/wellness11202012a.html


Disclaimer:
Please note, this information is based on my understanding and is only to be used for informational and educational purposes.  Do not take what I am writing as advice.  Seek your own legal counsel and/or see a tax accountant before making business or personal decisions.



View Trevor Stasik's profile on LinkedIn

Sunday, November 25, 2012

PPACA - The Medical Loss Ratio


Good afternoon.  I am going to take a break from discussing Human Resources Interviews to talk a little bit more about an interesting aspect of the Patient Protection Affordability and Care Act (PPACA), also known in some circles as Obamacare or the ACA.  I was looking over the government’s healthcare website www.healthcare.gov and picking up some information.  The aspect I want to discuss is the Medical Loss Ratio. 

This is the Medical Loss Ratio calculation:  Divide the amount spent on mediacl care divided by the amount spent on premiums.  This ratio calculation, in effect since 11/22/2010, states that insurance companies are required to use 80% to 85% of all premium dollars directly on medical care.  This is intended to provide consumers with more value for their medical dollar, as premium dollars will no longer be allowed to be allocated to administrative costs, overhead, marketing, or executive salaries.     In the event that an insurance company spends more than this premium percentage amount on non-medical costs, that money will be rebated back to the customers after the end of August each year.  As of the end of 2011, average rebate per person that could be expected was $164.  However, most insurers reduced the rate of premium growth rather than be forced with giving rebates after the fact.

Starting last year, insurance companies had to begin reporting total premiums, total reimbursement for medical service, spending on quality improvement programs, and administrative costs to the Health and Human Services (HHS).  These reports are then publicly posted by HHS.  At the moment, I am researching where you can find that on their site.  In the meantime, you can view the link at the bottom of the page for the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL).  The insurers will be able to deduct the taxes that apply to health insurance coverage from the insurers revenue when calculating the Medical Loss Ratio.  There are accommodations, exceptions, and waivers that may apply to your individual organization, be sure to check with a lawyer and/or tax accountant for an expert opinion.

Finally, keep in mind that there is a financial penalty that may be imposed for insurers failing to meet the Medical Loss Ratio percentage.  There will also be penalties that may be assessed for failure to supply accurate or timely information about plan coverage to the HHS.  The penalty assessed for each instance of non-compliance will be $100 per day for each person in the plan.

And remember all of you Human Resources professionals:  Be Human... Be a Resource...  Be a Resource for Humans.


Relevant Links:
http://www.healthcare.gov/news/factsheets/2010/11/medical-loss-ratio.html
http://www.ehow.com/how_6460957_calculate-medical-loss-ratio.html
http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/health/health-insurance-medical-loss-ratios.aspx


Disclaimer:
Please note, this information is based on my understanding and is only to be used for informational and educational purposes.  Do not take what I am writing as advice.  Seek your own legal counsel and/or see a tax accountant before making business or personal decisions.




View Trevor Stasik's profile on LinkedIn

Sunday, November 18, 2012

States and Healthcare Exchanges

Good Evening Everyone!  I will try to get back to the posts about interviews tomorrow.  I wanted to take a second out to touch on the Patient Protection and Affordability Care Act (PPACA) again and an interesting article I stumbled on over at www.lifehealthpro.com.  The article is about the Healthcare Exchanges that are being put together in preparation of Jan. 1, 2014, the date on which every American will be required to have health insurance.  The Exchanges will be there for those that do not have employer offered healthcare or for those that think their employer’s healthcare is not affordable.

This article is interesting because it discusses some of the differences across states.  Under the PPACA, states have three options:  They can run their own state-run healthcare exchange, they can enter a shared-responsibility partnership with the Federal Government, or they can allow the Federal Government to take full responsibility.  At this time, 17 states (plus Washington D.C.) have decided to set up state-run exchanges.  There are 20 states that are asking for the Federal Government to take full responsibility; plus 5 that are forming a shared partnership.  The remaining states, including Pennsylvania, are waiting for questions to be answered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).  According to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, states are required to declare their intent to run their own exchange by Dec. 14, 2012 or they will forfeit that responsibility to the Federal Government.

 One of the challenging items for Governors and state governments in their decision process is that the regulations governing the operation of the exchanges are incomplete.  Joel Ario, the former director of the Office of Insurance Exchanges at the HSS is concerned that the Federal Government may not be able to meet the PPACA deadlines for setting up the exchanges.

Link to article:  http://www.lifehealthpro.com/2012/11/16/who-will-start-a-ppaca-exchange




View Trevor Stasik's profile on LinkedIn

Friday, November 16, 2012

A Quick Look at the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)


I had the fortune of attending the Pottstown Society of Human Resources (SHRM) Meeting yesterday.  It was an informative and interesting look at the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) presented by Charon Planning consulting.  I would like to share some of the highlights from that PPACA presentation, supplemented with some additional information pulled from the SHRM and IRS websites. 

PPACA Rollout

Now that the PPACA is the law of the land, there are significant changes that will fundamentally transform almost every aspect of pay and benefits in the United States between now and 2018. 

For quite some time, many businesses were holding off on making changes due to the possible change in the landscape.  However, the election is over.  There will not be any changes in leadership between now and the rollout of this plan.  It is imperative for HR, Payroll, and Benefits waste no time in starting the change procedure.  Be sure to communicate changes to your employees as they happen as they will need the information to make their decisions.

FSA Changes 2013

The PPACA limits pre-tax contributions to Flexible Spending Accounts to $2,500 for calendar 2013.  There has been some further clarification by the IRS on that limit:  Employers that offer more generous FSAs have until Dec. 31, 2014 to roll out the changes to existing employees, but no new employees can have the higher limit during 2013 or 2014.  As a result of the PPACA, the “Use it or Lose it” rule may or may not be lifted, pending resolution by the Treasury Dept and the IRS.

Full Time Employees

The definition of Full Time Employee is changing in 2014, starting with a required “measurement period” for existing employees on Jan. 1, 2013.  Full Time is considered any employee who on average works 30 hours in a month, or could reasonably have been expected to have worked 30 hours.  After the “measurement period” of 1 year ends, the employees will be eligible for coverage based on the calculation.  There is than a 90 day time frame known as the “administrative period” where employees will be notified of their status and options.  Following that comes a “stability period”, which happens concurrently with the next “measurement period”.  There is a more complicated calculation which will be required for new 2013 employees where a calculation of an overlapping “stability period” will be required for 2014 and after.

90 Day Waiting Period

Starting in 2014, Employers will be required to determine within the first 90 days following hire whether an employee will be eligible to enter the employer based insurance.  Since a “measurement period” will not yet have been completed, employers will need to base this determination on expectation of whether the employee could be expected to work full time over the next year.

Full Time Employee Penalties

Per IRS codes 4980H(a) and 4980H(b), companies with greater than 50 employees of any sort will be required to offer coverage.  Full Time Employees will be required to be covered by “affordable” medical insurance.  If you do not offer coverage to these Full Time Employees, a $2,000 per employee penalty will apply.  If medical insurance is provided, but it is determined that it is not affordable under Safe Harbor calculations and any single employee chooses to use a heathcare exchange, the lesser of $3,000 per employee using the exchange or a $2,000 per employee (every employee) penalty will be applied.  If a penalty is applied, the employer will also lose their 35% pretax corporate tax savings on the cost of the medical plan.  Additionally, if the penalty is applied, the employer will also lose their 0.0765% FICA tax break.  In the event affordable coverage is offered by the employer, affordability being determined per the Safe Harbor calculation applied to both the individual, spouse, and family; and the employee chooses to enter the exchange, then there will not be a penalty applied.

Healthcare Subsidy

An employee can decide for any reason that an employer offered plan is not right for them, whether it is due to affordability or other issues.  Should they choose to decline the offer, they may receive a government subsidy for their healthcare.  Individual employees making less than $44,680 annually will be eligible to receive a subsidy.  Employees with a spouse making less than $60,520 will be eligible to receive a subsidy.  There is a graduated scale of subsidies which will be provided from the government based on the number of children and marriage status.

Out of Time

Okay, I am out of time to post for today.  There is really so much stuff here, I have barely scratched the surface of the PPACA.  I have not even gotten to the Heathcare exchanges.   If I have time, I will circle back around to PPACA in the future.  There is still so much information.

Disclaimer

Please note, this information is based on my understanding and is only to be used for informational and educational purposes.  Do not take what I am writing as advice.  Seek legal counsel before making business or personal decisions. 



Relevant Links:
http://www.shrm.org/hrdisciplines/benefits/articles/pages/fsaguidance.aspx
http://www.shrm.org/hrdisciplines/benefits/articles/pages/ppaca-full-time-employees.aspx
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title26/pdf/USCODE-2011-title26-subtitleD-chap43-sec4980H.pdf
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr3590enr/pdf/BILLS-111hr3590enr.pdf

Organizational Links:
Charon Planning consulting group (http://www.charonplanning.com/)
Pottstown SHRM (http://gtrpottstown.shrm.org/)


View Trevor Stasik's profile on LinkedIn


Monday, October 6, 2008

403 (b)(7) Plans

Here is a quick review about some facts about 403(b)(7) retirement plans. All information should be accurate as of today's date Oct. 6, 2008.

This retirement plan is used for government, charity, and non-profit organizations. In this plan, pre-tax contributions are made by employees and any employer contributions are tax deductible.
Contribution Limits For Employers: 100% of participant's compensation or $46,000 and the Exclusion Allowance
Contribution Limits For Employees: $15,500
Catch up Contributions for Employees with > 15 years of Service:
  • $5,000
  • $15,000 minus amounts previously excluded from gross income under the "catch up provision"
  • $5,000 X Years Working For Employer - Elective Deferrals

  • Age Limits: Must take RMD by April 1st of achieving age 70.5 or after retirement, whichever is longer.
    Qualified Exceptions for Pre-Mature Distribution include: Death, disability, life expectancy formula, separation from service after age 55, hardship, court order, and medical bills greater that 7.5% of Adjusted Gross Income.
    Loans are allowed on 403(b) plans.


    View Trevor Stasik's profile on LinkedIn